Homepage CASE
  • Date:

    1 Jun 2022 - 31 Dec 2022

  • Project duration:

    01.06.2022 - 31.12.2022

  • Partners:

    CASE - Center for Social and Economic Research, ISPI - Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale, London School of Economics, University of Innsbruck, University of Göttingen, Università del Piemonte Orientale

The idea of European strategic autonomy has its origins in the fields of security and defense, but has started to resonate beyond these areas extending to foreign and trade policies. The Covid pandemic and more recently the Russian invasion in Ukraine, have made clear the vulnerability of global value chains and the need to maintain functioning and resilient supply chains and trade flows during such crises.

The study should focus on Open Strategic Autonomy and explore the foundations of a contemporary European supply of raw materials, energy and critical goods. It should address the following questions:

  • Which raw materials are particularly important for the EU – especially against the background of the green transformation – and at the same time critical in terms of supply?
  • Where are these currently obtained from and what alternative sources are there?
  • What (economic) importance could raw material partnerships in the EU have?
  • How can the EU, whenever possible, work strategically with trade partners and, when necessary, defend its interests and take autonomous trade decisions offsetting other countries’ unfair practices and undue interferences?

One aim of the study is to provide an overview of critical raw materials bearing in mind the focal points of the (political) debate. It shall analyse the potential of bilateral/regional raw material agreements.

The study shall focus on how international trade and investment can help address EU’s vulnerabilities relating to energy, raw materials and critical goods (including agricultural products like grain) and on the importance of global value chains for the strategic sectors concerned. It shall analyse how international agreements as well as legislative and other tools so far address these items and, in particular, the question of raw materials dependency of the EU. It should also look at the EU’s open strategic autonomy and internal economic initiatives (like the Chip’s act and the Industrial Strategy) and identify possible synergies. Finally, the study should provide an overview on possible cooperation with like-minded third countries.

Project partners: CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research,  ISPI – Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale, London School of Economics, University of Innsbruck, University of Göttingen, Università del Piemonte Orientale

Client: European Parliament’s Committee on International Trade (INTA)

Related projects

How the EU should prepare for the enlargement in terms of governance, policies and investments: options and choices made from a territorial perspective

  In its 2023 enlargement package, the European Commission recommended that the Council open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova. Moreover, it recommended that the Council grant Georgia the status of candidate country and open accession negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina, once the necessary degree of compliance with the membership criteria has been achieved.  The … Continued

Increasing economic resilience of Armenia, Georgia and Moldova

The project will be conducted in the context of the ongoing war in Ukraine and Russia’s increasingly assertive regional policy, which will continue to affect the economic situation of the three analysed countries via various channels – trade of goods and services, remittances of labour migrants, financial flows, energy dependence (all countries are net energy … Continued

EU4Belarus: Reinforcing Resilience and Democratisation

Private sector was the key driver of protests following unfair presidential election in Belarus in August 2020 and faced harsh government response aftermath. The political crisis affected many Belarusian private companies in different sectors as well as self-employed. Among factors negatively affecting domestic business development were the risks of inspections, closures, arrests; unwillingness to pay … Continued

No results
Loading...

Thanks for joining us!

You're now part of a community that values [your newsletter's focus]. Get ready to stay informed, inspired, and engaged with our carefully curated content.

Join the community of informed readers. Subscribe to our newsletter.